ISSN: 2277-405X
Re-architecting BPM Quality Assurance with Agentic AI
Paper ID: IJATRD-2026-00040
DOI :
DOI: https://doi.org/10.67750/ijatrd.v3.i2.40Keywords:
Keywords:
Abstract:
Abstract
Business Process Management (BPM) quality assurance is under increasing strain from rising interaction complexity, omnichannel fragmentation, and the operational limits of manual sample-based review. Conventional QA models provide only partial coverage, delayed feedback, and inconsistent evaluator performance across voice, email, chat, and back-office processes. These constraints cannot be solved by incremental scoring automation alone and instead require a shift from retrospective auditing to AI-led quality engineering. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that integrates six design elements: omnichannel evidence capture, context assembly, hybrid evaluator models, agent orchestration, human-in-the-loop oversight, and cross-cutting governance. The framework is further extended through a multi-layer evaluation model, a loop-engineering construct for continuous improvement, and a five-stage enterprise maturity model for adoption sequencing. The paper’s central contribution is a reusable design theory for treating service quality as an engineered, governed, and continuously improving system in omnichannel BPM environments.
How to Cite
Guda, S. (2026, September 29).
Re-architecting BPM Quality Assurance with Agentic AI.
https://ijatrd.org/en/article/2026-00040
References:
References
McKinsey & Company. AI mastery in customer care: Raising the bar for quality assurance. July 31, 2024.
Gartner. Gartner predicts agentic AI will autonomously resolve 80% of common customer service issues without human intervention by 2029. Press Release, March 5, 2025.
Anthropic. Building effective agents. December 19, 2024.
OpenAI. Evaluate agent workflows. OpenAI API Documentation, 2026.
IBM Institute for Business Value. The CEO’s Guide to Generative AI: Back office process automation. May 27, 2024.
Evidently AI. LLM-as-a-judge: a complete guide to using LLMs for evaluations. May 19, 2026.
Chen, G. H., Chen, S., Liu, Z., Jiang, F., and Wang, B. Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Bias. Proceedings of EMNLP, 2024, pp. 8301-8327.